DOI 000000

UDC 628.169

Kofman V. Ya.

Enhancement of biogas generation during anaerobic digestion of excess activated sludge (a review)

Summary

In the process of biological wastewater treatment vast amounts of sludge are generated. Among the methods of sludge handling anaerobic digestion holds a prominent place combining both possible biogas production and prevention of secondary environmental pollution. The rate-limiting stage of anaerobic digestion is hydrolysis. Sludge pretreatment is a common way to increase the rate of hydrolysis and enhance biogas production; developing pretreatment options has been an area of noticeable exploratory activity. Methods of chemical pretreatment (acidic, alkaline, electrochemical oxidation, ozonation, Fenton process, persulfate process, treatment with calcium peroxide), biological pretreatment (two-stage thermophilic/mesophilic process) and physical pretreatment (thermal hydrolysis, microwave treatment, electrokinetic disintegration, ultrasonic treatment, high pressure homogenization) are considered. The patented technologies for pretreatment of wastewater sludge and the main manufacturers of the relative equipment are presented. As an alternative to the traditional anaerobic digestion a microbial electrolysis cell is considered where methane generation during electromethanogenesis occurs in the presence of exoelectrogenic bacteria. A number of wastewater sludge pretreatment technologies are currently available for the implementation on an industrial scale. In this regard, an urgent need in the development of a standardized methodology for analyzing the technical and economic indicators of various anaerobic digestion systems is evident in order to select an optimal option for specific conditions.

Key words

surplus active silt , anaerobic fermentation , thermal hydrolysis , pretreatment , acidic treatment , alkaline treatment , electrochemical treatment , Fenton process , persulfate process , microbial electrolysis cell , electrokinetic disintegration , ultrasonic treatment , homogenization , microwave treatment

The further text is accessible on a paid subscription.
For authorisation enter the login/password.
Or subscribe

REFERENCES

1. Zhen G., Lu. X., Kato H., et al. Overview of pretreatment strategies for enhancing sewage sludge disintegration and subsequent anaerobic digestion: Current advances, fullscale application and future perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, v. 69, pp. 559–577.
2. Devlin D. C., Esteves S. R. R., Dinsdale R. M., et al. The effect of acid pretreatment on the anaerobic digestion and dewatering of waste activated sludge. Bioresource Technology, 2011, v. 102, pp. 4076–4082.
3. Takashima M, Tanaka Y. Acidic thermal post-treatment for enhancing anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Journal of Environmental and Chemistry Engineering, 2014, v. 2, pp. 773–779.
4. Romero-Gulza M., Zahedi S., Monsalvo V., et al. Nitrite and free nitrous acid sludge pre-treatments to enhance methane production in continuous anaerobic digestion: Comparing process performance and associated costs. Waste Management, 2019, v. 95, pp. 52–534.
5. Lin Y. Q., Wang D. H., Wu S. Q., et al. Alkali pretreatment enhances biogas production in the anaerobic digestion of pulp and paper sludge. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, v. 170, pp. 366–373.
6. Zhang S. T., Guo H. G., Du L. Z., et al. Influence of NaOH and thermal pretreatment on dewatered activated sludge solubilisation and subsequent anaerobic digestion: focused on high-solid state. Bioresource Technology, 2015, v. 185, pp. 171–177.
7. Zhang P., Chen Y. G., Zhou Q., et al. Understanding short-chain fatty acids accumulation enhanced in waste activated sludge alkaline fermentation: kinetics and microbiology. Environmental Science and Technology, 2010, v. 44, pp. 9343–9348.
8. Zhen G., Lu X., Li Y. Y., Zhao Y. Combined electrical-alkali pretreatment to increase the anaerobic hydrolysis rate of waste activated sludge during anaerobic digestion. Applied Energy, 2014, v. 128, pp. 93–102.
9. Li Q., Yu Z., Yu S., et al. Organic matter rather than salinity as a predominant feature changes performance and microbiome in methanogenic sludge digesters. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2019, v. 377, pp. 349–356.
10. Campos J. L., Otero L., Franco A., et al. Ozonation strategies to reduce sludge production of a seafood industry WWTP. Bioresource Technology, 2009, v. 100, pp. 1069–1073.
11. Manterola G., Uriarte I., Sancho L. The effect of operational parameters of the process of sludge ozonation on the solubilisation of organic and nitrogenous compounds. Water Research, 2008, v. 42, pp. 3191–3197.
12. Chu L. B., Yan S. T., Xing X. H., et al. Enhanced sludge solubilization by microbubble ozonation. Chemosphere, 2008, v. 72, pp. 205–212.
13. Zhen G. Y., Lu X. Q., Zhao Y. C., et al. Enhanced dewaterability of sewage sludge in the presence of Fe(II)-activated persulfate oxidation. Bioresource Technology, 2012, v. 116, pp. 259–265.
14. Zhen G. Y., Lu X. Q., Niu J., et al. Inhibitory effects of a shock load of Fe(II)-mediated persulfate oxidation on waste activated sludge anaerobic digestion. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013, v. 233, pp. 274–281.
15. Wang D., He D., Liu X., et al. The underlying mechanism of calcium peroxide pretreatment enhancing methane production from anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge. Water Research, 2019, v. 164, an 114934.
16. Zeng Q., Zan F., Hao T. Electrochemical pretreatment for stabilization of waste activated sludge: Simultaneously enhancing dewaterability, inactivating pathogens and mitigating hydrogen sulfide. Water Research, 2019, v. 166, аn 115035.
17. Yang H. G., Chun H. Y., Pak D. Improvement of sludge anaerobic degradability by combined electro-flotation and electro-oxidation treatment. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2014, v. 90, pp. 44–48.
18. Sahinkaya S., Kalipci E., Aras S. Disintegration of waste activated sludge by different applications of Fenton process. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2015, v. 93, pp. 274–281.
19. Ge H. Q., Jensen P. D., Batstone D. J. Increased temperature in the thermophilic stage in temperature phased anaerobic digestion (TPAD) improves degradability of waste activated sludge. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, v. 187, pp. 355–361.
20. Zhao Z., Zhang Y., Yu Q., et al. Enhanced decomposition of waste activated sludge via anodic oxidation for methane production and bioenergy recovery. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 2016, v. 106, pp. 161–169.
21. Liu W., Cai W., Guo Z., et al. Microbial electrolysis contribution to anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge, leading to accelerated methane production. Renewable Energy, 2016, v. 91, pp. 334–339.
22. Guo X., Liu J., Xiao B. Bioelectrochemical enhancement of hydrogen and methane production from the anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge in single-chamber membrane-free microbial electrolysis cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, v. 38, pp. 1342–1347.
23. Sevda S., Sreekishnan T. R., Pous N., et al. Bioelectroremediation of perchlorate and nitrate contaminated water: a review. Bioresource Technology, 2018, v. 255, pp. 331–339.
24. Peng H., Zhao Z., Xiao H., et al. A strategy for enhancing anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge: Driving anodic oxidation by adding nitrate into microbial electrolysis cell. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2019, v. 81, pp. 34–42.
25. Tian T., Qiao S., Yu C., Zhou J. Effects of nano-sized MnO2 on methanogenic propionate and butyrate degradation in anaerobic digestion. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2019, v. 364, pp. 11-18.
26. Chen J. L., Steele T. W. J., Stuckey D. C. The effect Fe2NiO4 and Fe4NiO4Zn magnetic nanoparticles on anaerobic digestion activity. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, v. 642, pp. 276–284.
27. De Velasco-Maldonado P. S., Pat-Espadas A. M., Chazaro-Ruiz L. F., et al. Cold oxygen plasma induces changes on the surface of carbon materials enhancing methanogenesis and N2O reduction in anaerobic sludge incubations. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 2019, v. 94, № 10, pp. 336–3374.
28. Nguyen D., Wu Z., Shrestha S., et al. Intermittent micro-aeration: New strategy to control volatile fatty acid accumulation in high organic loading anaerobic digestion. Water Research, 2019, v. 166, pp. 115080.
29. Martin M. A., Gonzalez I., Serrano A., Siles J. A. Evaluation of the improvement of sonication pre-treatment in the anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Journal of Environmental Management, 2015, v. 147, pp. 330–337.
30. Feng X., Lei H., Deng J., Yu Q., Li H. Physical and chemical characteristics of waste activated sludge treated ultrasonically. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 2009, v. 48, pp. 187–194.
31. Appels L., Houtmeyers S., Degreve J., et al. Influence of microwave pre-treatment on sludge solubilization and pilot scale semi-continuous anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technology, 2013, v. 128, pp. 598–603.
32. Eskicioglu C., Kennedy K. J., Droste R. L. Enhanced disinfection and methane production from sewage sludge by microwave irradiation. Desalination, 2009, v. 248, pp. 279–285.
33. Lee I. S., Rittmann B. E. Effect of low solids retention time and focused pulsed pretreatment on anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge. Bioresource Technology, 2011, v. 102, pp. 2542–2548.
34. Choi H., Jeong S. W., Chung Y. J. Enhanced anaerobic gas production of waste activated sludge pretreated by pulse power technique. Bioresource Technology, 2006, v. 97, pp. 198–203.
35. Pilli S., Yan S., Tyagi R. D., Surampalli R. Y. Thermal pretreatment of sewage sludge to enhance anaerobic digestion: a review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2015, v. 45, pp. 669–702.
36. Shi X., Zhao J., Chen L. Genomic dynamics of full-scale temperature-phased anaerobic gigestion treating waste activated sludge: Focusing on temperature differentiation. Waste Management, 2019, v. 87, pp. 621–628.
37. Cusick R. D., Logan B. E. Phosphate recovery as struvite within a single chamber microbial electrolysis cell. Bioresource Technology, 2012, v. 107, pp. 110–115.
38. Monlau F., Sambusiti C., Ficara E., et al. New opportunities for agricultural digestate valorization: current situation and perspectives. Energy and Environmental Science, 2015, v. 8, pp. 2600–2621.
39. Lippens C., De Vrieze J. Exploiting the unwanted: Sulphate reduction enables phosphate recovery from energy-rich sludge during anaerobic digestion. Water Research, 2019, v. 163, an 114859.
40. Stasinakis A. S. Review on the fate of emerging contaminants during sludge anaerobic digestion. Bioresourсe Technology, 2012, v. 121, pp. 432–440.
41. Pilli S., More T. T., Yan S., et al. Fenton pre-treatment of secondary sludge to enhance anaerobic digestion: energy balance and greenhouse gas emissions. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, v. 283, pp. 285–292.