№7|2019

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

bbk 000000

UDC 614.7:613.15

Budarina O. V., Pinigin M. A., Iakovlev N. V.

Living standards in the area close to wastewater treatment facilities – sources of odor nuisance

Summary

A review of literature data on the assessment of the impact of atmospheric air pollution on the living standards in the areas close to the enterprises – the sources of odor including wastewater treatment facilities is presented. Numerous studies have shown that perceptible odor in the atmospheric air and irritation caused by it results not only in the deterioration in the quality of life of people, but also in some disorders – somatic (headache, short wind, irritation of the respiratory tract, general malaise, etc.) and emotional (overstrain , fatigability, depression, etc.). At the same time, often the maximum permissible concentrations of certain pollutants are not exceeded which keeps the regulatory authorities from taking appropriate measures in relation to the enterprise. Therefore, in case of numerous complaints from the residents about odors and, as a result, deterioration of health and living standards it is necessary to significantly expand the approaches associated with assessing the impact of emissions from enterprises – sources of odor, primarily wastewater treatment facilities due to their commonness. To this end it is proposed to introduce into the regulation and monitoring practice the criteria compliance with which can ensure the absence of odor nuisance in the atmospheric air. In assessing the potential effects of odors on public health the comprehensive analysis of air pollution using various methods (instrumental and olfactory-odorimetric) and with a simultaneous survey of the population living under the conditions of different exposure levels to odor nuisance is of great importance. Conducting comprehensive and multi-attribute research will significantly improve the level of scientific knowledge in this field and open the door for controlling odor in the atmospheric air, in particular, when planning measures to reduce emissions of odorous substances.

Key words

, , , ,

The further text is accessible on a paid subscription.
For authorisation enter the login/password.
Or subscribe

REFERENCES

  1. Lowman A., McDonald M. A., Wing S., Muhammad N. Land application of treated sewage sludge: Community health and environmental justice. Environmental Health Prospect, 2013, no. 121, pp. 537–542.
  2. Odours and human health. Environmental public health science unit, health protection branch, public health and compliance division, Alberta health. Edmonton, Alberta, 2017. [Electronic media]. URL: https://open.alberta.ca/publications/9781460131534 (accessed 10.04.2019).
  3. Sucker K., Both R., Winneke G. Review of adverse health effects of odours in field studies. Water Science Technology, 2009, no. 59, pp. 1281–1289.
  4. Iatsenko-Khmelevskaia M. Ia, Tsybul’skii V. V., Khitrina N. G., Korolenro L. I. [Olfactometric study of odor emissions at the Russian enterprises]. Biosfera, 2013, v. 5, no. 3, pp. 303–310. (In Russian).
  5. Aatamila M., Verkasalo P. K., Korhonen M. J., Suominen A. L., Hirvonen M. R. Odour annoyance and physical symptoms among residents living near waste treatment centers. Environmental Research, 2011, no. 111, pp. 164–170.
  6. Cavalini P. M. Industrial odorants: the relationship between modeled exposure concentrations and annoyance. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1994, no. 49, pp. 344–351.
  7. Schiffman S. S., Williams C. M. Science of odor as a potential health issue. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2005, no. 34, pp. 129–138.
  8. Winneke G. The assessment of the impact of environmental odours in the community: Environmental Odour Management. International Conference. Cologne, 17–19 November 2004, pp. 5–7.
  9. Herr C. E., zur Nieden A., Kopka I., Rethage T., Gieler U. Assessment of somatic complaints in environmental health. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 2009, no. 212, pp. 27–36.
  10. Radon K., Schulze A., Ehrenstein V., van Strien R. T., Praml G. Environmental exposure to confined animal feeding operations and respiratory health of neighboring residents. Epidemiology, 2007, no. 18, pp. 300–308.
  11. Winneke G., Sucker K., Both R. Population odour annoyance is influenced by the hedonic quality of industrial odours. Environmental Odour Management: International Conference. Cologne, 17–19 November 2004, pp. 9–12.
  12. Van Harreveld A. P. From odorant formation to odour nuisance: new definitions for discussing a complex process. Water Science & Technology, 2001, no. 44, pp. 9–15.
  13. Axelsson G., Stockfelt L., Andersson E., Gidlof-Gunnarsson A., Sallsten G. Annoyance and worry in a petrochemical industrial area – prevalence, time trends and risk indicators. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2013, no. 10, pp. 1418–1438.
  14. De Feo G., De Gisi S., Williams I. D. Public perception of odour and environmental pollution attributed to MSW treatment and disposal facilities: a case study. Waste Management, 2013, no. 33, pp. 974–987.
  15. Steinheider B., Both R., Winneke G. Field studies on environmental odours inducing annoyance as well as gastric and general health-related symptoms. Journal of Psychophysiology, 1998, sippl. 1, pp. 64–79.
  16. Brancher M., Piringer M., Franco D., Belli Filho P., De Melo Lisboa H., Schauberger G. Assessing the inter-annual variability of separation distances around odour sources to protect the residents from odour annoyance. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2018. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327935366 (accessed 12.04.2019).
  17. Atari D. O., Luginaah I. N., Gorey K., Xu X., Fung K. Associations between self-reported odour annoyance and volatile organic compounds in Sarnia, «Chemical Valley», Ontario. Environmental Monitoring Assessment, 2012, no. 185, pp. 4537–4549.
  18. Cervinka R., Neudorfer E. Odour control at a municipal sewage collector: psychological perspectives: Environmental Odour Management. International Conference. Cologne, 17–19 November 2004, pp. 13–25.
  19. Horton R. A., Wing S., Marshall S. W., Brownley K. A. Malodor as a trigger of stress and negative mood in neighbors of industrial hog operations. American Journal of Public Health, 2009, no. 99, pp. 610–615.
  20. Thu K., Donham K., Ziegenhorn R., Reynolds S., Thorne P. S. A control study of the physical and mental health of residents living near a large-scale swine operation. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health, 1997, no. 3, pp. 13–26.
  21. Oiamo T. H., Luginaah I. N., Baxter J. Cumulative effects of noise and odor annoyances on environmental and health related quality of life. Social Science & Medicine, 2015, no. 146, pp. 191–203.
  22. Effects and assessment of odours. Assessment of odour annoyance. Questionnaires. VDI 3883. Part 1. 2015.
  23. Budarina O. V., Pinigin M. A., Sabirova Z. F., Fedotova L. A. [Odor problems in ambient air of the wastewater treatment facilities: regulation, control and legislative regulation]. Vodosnabzhenie i Sanitarnaia Tekhnika, 2017, no. 8, pp. 20–28. (In Russian).
  24. Ponomareva O. Iu., Budarina O. V., Beliaeva N. N. [Cellular indicators of the respiratory system at the hygienic estimation of the ambient air pollution with odorous substances]. Mir Nauki, Kul’tury, Obrazovaniia, 2011, no. 4, pp. 277–280. (In Russian).
  25. Beliaeva N. N., Sycheva L. P., Zhurkov V. S., Budarina O. V., Altaeva A. A., Ponomareva O. Iu., Kovalenko M. A. [The relationship of structural and functional (histological and cytological) indicators with cytogenetic and cytotoxic indicators in assessing the impact on the body of environmental factors]. Gigiena i Sanitariia, 2011, no. 5, pp. 48–50. (In Russian).
  26. Sycheva L. P., Budarina O. V., Sabirova Z. F., Akhal’tseva L. V., Rosolovskii A. P. [Cytogenetic status of children in the hygienic assessment of air pollution by odorous substances]. Gigiena i Sanitariia, 2016, no. 8, pp. 765–768. (In Russian).

Журнал ВСТ включен в новый перечень ВАК

Шлафман В. В. Проектирование под заданную ценность, или достижимая эффективность технических решений – что это?

Banner Kofman 1