bbk 000000

UDC 628.16.094.3

Kofman V. Ya.

New advanced oxidation technologies of water and wastewater treatment (part 2) (foreign publications review)

Summary

Newly developed oxidation technologies are applied in purification of water and wastewater containing toxic for microorganisms and non-biodegradable substances. Ultrasonic treatment provides for good results; however requires expensive equipment and much energy. The efficiency of this technology can be improved by using catalysts (titanium dioxide) and chemical additives; it is used as a process preceding biological treatment. Wet oxidation is considered as a perspective method of processing phosphorus-containing wastewater sludge. The process proceeds in the presence of oxygen at 160–220 °С and 12–28 bar pressure with addition of sulfuric acid (рН 1.5). The technology of oxidation in supercritical water is based on interaction of organic pollutants with oxidizers in homogenous supercritical medium. The process is carried out at 400–650 °С temperature and 220–350 bar pressure. Experiments of inactivating Escherichia coli bacteria in river water with the use of impulse corona discharge (inactivation rate 99.8%) were carried out. The technology of plasma water treatment was tested on laboratory scale so far. The use of alkali metal ferrates (VI) that provide for removing suspended solids, phosphates, and reducing COD and BOD is considered as a perspective method of water treatment. Electrochemical processes are characterized by flexibility, safety, selectivity and higher cost-effectiveness; they allow eliminating ammonium and nitrates from wastewater. The use of combined process flow schemes can result in the reduction of operating expenditures at higher water treatment efficiency compared to the use of separate oxidation technologies. It is supposed that as research and design in this area advance the number of industrial scale plants using combined wastewater treatment flow schemes will grow.

Key words

advanced oxidation technologies , wet oxidation , supercritical water , plasma treatment , ferrates , electrochemical process

The further text is accessible on a paid subscription.
For authorisation enter the login/password.
Or subscribe

СПИСОК ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ / REFERENCES

Кофман В. Я. Новые окислительные технологии (часть 1) // Водоснабжение и санитарная техника. 2013. № 10. С. 68–78. Kofman V. Ia. Novye okislitel’nye tekhnologii [New advanced oxidation technologies of water and wastewater treatment (part 1)]. Vodosnabzhenie i Sanitarnaia Tekhnika, 2013, no. 10, pp. 68–78. (In Russian).
1. Pang Y. L., Abdulah A. Z., Bhatia S. Review on sonochemical methods in the presence of catalysts and chemical additives for treatment of organic pollutants in waste water. Desalination, 2011, no. 277, pp. 1–14.
2. Kubo M., Matsuoka K., Takahashi A., Shibasaki­Kitakawa N., Yonemoto T. Kinetics of ultrasonic degradation of phenol in the presence of TiO2 particles. Ultrasonic Sonochemistry, 2005, no. 12 (4), pp. 263–269.
3. Wang J., Ma T., Zhang Z., Zhang X., Jiang Y., Zhang G., Zhao G., Zhao H., Zhang P. Investi­gation on transition crystal of ordinary rutile TiO2 powder and its sonocatalytic activity. Ultrasonic Sonochemistry, 2007, no. 14 (2), pp. 246–252.
4. Wang Y., Zhao D., Ma W., Chen C., Zhao J. Enhanced sonocatalytic degradation of azo dyes by Au/TiO2. Environmental Science and Technology, 2008, no. 42 (16), pp. 6173–6178.
5. Wang J., Liu Y., Zhang Z., Deng Y., Zhang L., Liu B., Xu R., Zhang X. Sonocatalytic degradation of azo fuchsine in the presence of the Co­doped and Cr­doped mixed crystal TiO2 powders and comparison of their sonocatalytic activity. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, no. 170 (1), pp. 398–404.
6. Zheng W., Maurin M., Tarr M. A. Enchancement of sonochemical degradation of phenol using hydrogen atom scavengers. Ultrasonic Sonochemistry, 2005, no. 12 (4), pp. 313–317.
7. Goel M., Hongqiang H., Mujumdar A. S., Ray M. B. Sonochemical decomposition of volatile and non­volatile organic compounds – a comparative study. Water Research, 2004, no. 38 (19), pp. 4247–4261.
8. Guo Z., Feng R. Ultrasonic irradiation­induced degradation of low­concentration bisphenol A in aqueous solution. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, no. 163 (2–3), pp. 855–860.
9. Merouani S., Hamdaoui O., Saoudi F., Chiba M. Sonochemical degradation of Rhodamine B in aqueous phase: effects of additives. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2010, no. 158 (3), pp. 550–557.
10. Golash N., Gogate P. R. Degradation of dichlorvos containing wastewater using sonochemical reactors. Ultrasonic Sonochemistry, 2012, no. 19 (5), pp. 1051–1060.
11. Blocher C., Niewersch C., Melin T. Phosphorus recovery from sewage sludge with a hybrid process of low pressure wet oxidation and nanofiltration. Water Research, 2012, no. 46, pp. 2009–2019.
12. Loppinet­Sereani A., Aymonier C., Canseli F. Supercritical water for environmental technology. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 2010, no. 85, pp. 583–591.
13. Xu D., Wang S., Tang X., Gong Y., Guo Y., Wang Y., Zhang J. Design of the first pilot scale plant of China for supercritical water oxidation of sewage sludge. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2012, no. 90 (2), pp. 288–297.
14. Takahashi F., Oshima Y., Fukushi K., Yamamoto K. Enhanced oxidation of alkali metal acetate in supercritical water. Chemistry Letters, 2012, no. 41, pp. 267–269.
15. Qiu K.­J, Wang Z.­Z. Experimental study on coking wastewater treatment by supercritical water oxidation. Gong Yongshui yu Feishui (Industrial Water and Wastewater), 2012, no. 43 (2), pp. 22–24, 37.
16. Zhu N., Zhang F. Progress on the dehalogenation mechanisms of persistent organic halogenated compounds in subcritical water. Huangjing Huaxue (Environmental Chemistry), 2012, no. 31 (4), pp. 415–421.
17. Wen X. Q., Wang M., Liu X. H. Effect of electrode configuration on the wastewater treatment by underwater electrical streamer discharge. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 2012, no. 40 (4), pp. 1089–1093.
18. Foster J., Sommers B. S., Gucker S. N., Blankson I. M., Adamovsky G. Perspective on the interaction of plasmas with liquid water for water purification. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 2012, no. 40 (5), pp. 1311–1323.
19. Li S., Hu S., Zhang H. Formation of hydroxyl radicals and hydrogen peroxide by a novel nanosecond pulsed plasma power in water. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 2012, no. 40 (1), pp. 63–67.
20. Перфильев Ю. Д., Куликов Л. А., Дедушенко С. К. Новая ферратная технология очистки воды. http://www.kge.msu.ru/ozone/archives/1rus_conf_pr/Presentations/Perfiliev.pdf.
21. Perfil’ev Iu. D., Kulikov L. A., Dedushenko S. K. Novaia ferratnaia tekhnologiia ochistki vody [Advanced ferrate water treatment technology]. http://www.kge.msu.ru/ozone/archives/1rus_conf_pr/Presentations/Perfiliev.pdf. (In Russian).
22. Alsheyab M., Jiang J. Q., Stanford C. On­line production of ferrate with an electrochemical method and its potential application for wastewater treatment: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, no. 90 (3), pp. 1350–1356.
23. Anquandah A. K., Sharma V. K., Knight D. A., Batchu S. R., Gardinali P. R. Oxidation of tri­methoprim by ferrate (VI): Kinetics, products and antibacterial activity. Environmental Science and Technology, 2011, no. 45 (24), pp. 10575–10581.
24. Sharma V. K. Oxidation of inorganic compounds by ferrate (VI) and ferrate (V): One­electron and two­electron transfer steps. Environmental Science and Technology, 2010, no. 44 (13), pp. 5148–5152.
25. Yang B., Ying G.­G., Zhao J.­L., Liu S., Zhou L.­J., Chen F. Removal of selected endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) during ferrate (VI) treatment of se­condary wastewater effluents. Water Research, 2012, no. 46 (7), pp. 2194–2204.
26. Liu C. S. Higgins C. P., Wang F., Shin W.­H. Effect of temperature on oxidative transformation of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) by persulfate activation in water. Separation and Purification Technolology, 2012, no. 91, pp. 46–51.
27. Chen W.­S., Su Y.­C. Removal of dinitrotoluenes in wastewater by sono­activated persulfate. Ultrasonic Sonochemistry, 2012, no. 19 (4), pp. 921–927.
28. Muhammad S., Shukla P. R., Tade O., Wang S. Heterogeneous activation of peroxymonosulphate by suppor­ted ruthenium catalysis for phenol degradation in water. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2012, no. 215–216, pp. 183–190.
29. Liang C., Lin Y.­T., Shih W.­H. Treatment of trichloroethylene by adsorption and persulfate oxidation in batch studies. Industrial Engineering and Chemical Research, 2009, no. 48 (18), pp. 8373–8380.
30. Sires I., Brillas E. Remediation of water pollution caused by pharmaceutical residues based on electrochemical separation and degradation technologies: A review. Environment International, 2012, no. 40, pp. 212–229.
31. Fernandes A., Pacheco M. J., Ciriaco L., Lopes A. Anodic oxidation of a biological treated leachate on a boron­doped diamond. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2012, no. 199–200, pp. 82–87.
32. Comninellis C., Kapalka A., Malato S., Parsons S. A., Poulios I., Mantzavinos D. Advanced oxidation processes for water treatment: advances and trends for R&D. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 2008, no. 83, pp. 769–776.
33. Harif T., Khai M., Adin A. Electrocoagulation versus chemical coagulation: Coagulation/flocculation mechanisms and resulting floc characteristics. Water Research, 2012, no. 46 (10), pp. 3177–3188.
34. Wang K., Liu S., Zhang Q., He Y. Pharmaceutical wastewater treatment by internal microelectrolysis­coagulation, biological treatment and activated carbon sorption. Environmental Technology, 2009, no. 30, pp. 1469–1474.
35. Jeong J., Lee J. Electrochemical oxidation of industrial wastewater with the tube type electrolysis module system. Separation and Purification Technology, 2012, no. 84, pp. 35–40.
36. Perez G., Saiz J., Ibanez R., Urtiaga A. M., Ortiz I. Assessment of the formation of inorganic oxidation by­products during the electrocatalytic treatment of ammonium from landfill leachates. Water Research, 2012, no. 46 (8), pp. 2579–2590.
37. Mook W. T., Chakrabarti M. H., Aroua M. K., Khan G. M. A., Ali B. S., Islam M. S., Abu Hassan M. A. Removal of total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), nitrate and total organic carbon (TOC) from aquaculture wastewater using electrochemical technology: A review. Desalination, 2012, no. 285, pp. 1–13.
38. Pikaar I., Li E., Rozendal R. A., Yuan Z., Keller J., Rabaey K. Long­term field test of an electrochemical method for sulfide removal from sewage. Water Research, 2012, no. 46 (9), pp. 3085–3093.
39. Oller I., Malato S., Sanchez­Perez J. A. Combination of advanced oxidation processes and biological treat­ments for wastewater decontamination: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 2011, no. 409, pp. 4141–4166.
40. Kastaned F., Maleterova Y., Kastanek P. Combination of advanced oxidation and/or reductive dehalogenation and biodegradation for the decontamination of waters contaminated with chlorinated organic compounds. Separation Science and Technology, 2007, no. 42, pp. 1613–1625.
41. Lapertot M., Ebrahimi S., Dazio S., Rubinelli A., Pulgarin C. Photo­Fenton and bilogical integrated process for degradation of a mixture of pesticides. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology, 2007, no. 186, pp. 34–40.
42. Ballesteros­Martin M. M., Sanchez­Perez J. A., Garcia­Sanchez J. L., Montes de Oca L., Casas Lopez J. L., Oller I. Degradation of alachlor and pyrimethanil by combined photo­Fenton and biolo­gical oxidation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, no. 155, pp. 342–349.
43. Sirtori C., Zapata A., Oller I., Gernjak W., Aguera A., Malato S. Decontamination industrial pharmaceutical wastewater by combining solar photo­Fenton and biological treatment. Water Research, 2009, no. 43, pp. 661–668.
44. Gunnarson L., Adolfsson­Erici B., Rutgersson C., Forlin L., Larsson D. G. J. Comparison of six different sewage treatment processes­reduction of estrogenic substances and effects on gene expression in exposed male fish. Science of the Total Environment, 2009, no. 407, pp. 5235–5242.
45. Carballa M., Manterola G., Larrea L., Ternes T., Omil F., Lema J. M. Influence of ozone pretreatment on sludge anaerobic digestion: removal of pharmaceutical and personal care products. Chemosphere, 2007, no. 67, pp. 1444–1452.
46. Prieto­Rodriguez L., Miralles­Cuevas S., Oller I., Aguera A., Li Puma G., Malato S. Treatment of emerging contaminants in wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) effluents by solar photocatalysis using low TiO2 concentrations. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2012, no. 211–212, pp. 131–137.
47. De la Cruz N., Gimenez J., Espugas S., Grandjean D., de Alencastro L. F., Pulgarin C. Degradation of 32 emergent contaminants by UV and neutral photo­Fenton in domestic wastewater effluent previously treated by active sludge. Water Research, 2012, no. 46 (6), pp. 1947–1957.
48. Garsia­Montano J., Torrades F., Garcia­Hortal J. A., Domenech X., Peral J. Degradation of Procion Red H­E7B reactive dye by coupling a photo­Fenton system with a sequencing batch reactor. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2006, no. 134, pp. 220–229.
49. Harrelkas F., Paulo A., Alves M. M., El Khadir L., Zaharaa O., Pons M. N. Photo­catalytic and combined anaerobic­photocatalytic treatment of textile dyes. Chemosphere, 2008, no. 72, pp. 1816–1822.
50. Hai F. L., Yamamoto K., Fukushi K. Development of a submerged membrane fungi reactor for textile wastewater treatment. Desalination, 2006, no. 192, pp. 315–322.
51. Soloman P. A., Basha C. A., Velan M., Balasubramanian N., Marimuthu P. Augmentation of biodegradability of pulp and paper industry wastewater by electrochemical pretreatment and optimization by RSM. Separation and Purification Technology, 2009, no. 69, pp. 109–117.
52. Balcioglu I. A., Sarac C., Kivilcimdan C., Tarlan E. Application of ozonation and biotreatment for forest industry wastewater. Ozone Science & Engineering, 2006, no. 28, pp. 431–436.
53. Dogruel S., Genceli E. A., Babuna F. G., Orhon D. An investigation on the optimal location of ozonation within biological treatment for a tannery wastewater. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 2006, no. 81, pp. 1877–1885.
54. Vidal G., Nietro J., Mansilla H. D., Bornhardt C. Combined oxidative and biological treatment of separated streams of tannery wastewater. Water Science and Technology, 2004, no. 49, pp. 287–292.
55. Bressan M., Liberatore L., D’Alessand­ro N., Tonucci L., Belli C., Ranalli G. Improved combined chemi cal and biological treatments of olive mill wastewater. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2004, no. 5, pp. 1228–1233.
56. Khoufi S., Aloui F., Sayadi S. Pilot scale hybrid process for olive mill wastewater treatment and reuse. Che­mical Engineering Processes, 2009, no. 48, pp. 643–650.
57. Sangave P. C., Gogate P. R., Pandit A. B. Combination of ozonation with conventional aerobic oxidation for distillery wastewater treatment. Chemosphere, 2007, no. 68, pp. 32–41.
58. Neczai E., Kacprzak M., Lach J., Okoniewaska E. Effect of sonication on combined treatment of landfill leachate and domestic sewage in SBR reactor. Desalination, 2007, no. 204, pp. 227–233.
59. Fernandes A., Pacheco M. J., Ciriaco L., Lopes A. Anodic oxidation of a biologically treated leachate on a boron­doped diamond anode. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2012, no. 199–200, pp. 82–87.
60. Oller I., Malato S., Sanchez­Perez J. A., Maldonado M. I., Gernjak W., Perez­Estrada L. A. Pre­industrial­scale combined solar photo­Fenton and immobilized biomass activated­sludge biotreatment. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2007, no. 46, pp. 7467–7475.
61. Zapata A., Malato S., Sanchez­Perez J. A., Oller I., Maldonado M. I. Scale­up strategy for a combined solar photo­Fenton/biological system for remediation of pesticide­contaminated water. Catalysis Today, 2010, no. 151, pp. 100–106.
62. Di Laconi C., Ramadori R., Lopez A. The effect of ozone on tannery wastewater biological treatment at demonstrative scale. Bioresource Technology, 2009, no. 100, pp. 6121–6124.