DOI 10.35776/VST.2021.07.03
УДК 628.35

Kharkina O. V., Iskalieva Karina, Malich Ekaterina

Comparison of aeration tank calculations using ASM2d and ATV models

Summary

A comparison is made of the results of calculating aeration tanks by ATV model (Standard ATV-DVWK-A131 E «Dimension of Single-Stage Activated Sludge Plants 2000»), that is a stochastic «table» model, and by ASM2d model, that is referred to as theoretical and describes, unlike ATV, biological wastewater treatment processes using enzymatic kinetics formulas. Calculations are performed for the same input data. The calculation results show essentially limited use of ATV model; this model, as originally given in the description of this model by the designers, provides for calculating aeration tanks only for a single value of the effluent quality in terms of ammonia nitrogen as 1 mg/l and does not provide for calculating aeration tanks in terms of nitrites. Moreover, the comparison of ATV and ASM2d show that achieving the specified quality of effluent in terms of ammonia nitrogen as 1 mg/l is possible only at specific values of the kinetic constants determined by the authors in this article; whereas, any change in at least one kinetic parameter of the wastewater results in an increase in the required aerobic age of activated sludge and, as a consequence, in the calculated volume of the aerobic zone by tens of percent, which proves the risk of not achieving the required effluent quality while using ATV model even for ammonium nitrogen concentration of 1 mg/l. Taking into account the fact that ATV Method does not provide for calculating aeration tanks for the effluent quality in terms of nitrites, the results of our calculation show that the aerobic age of activated sludge of 4.05 days for a temperature of 17 ºС proposed in ATV will make it possible to achieve the effluent quality in terms of nitrite nitrogen, 0.35–0.52 mg/l N–NO2, proving the unavailability of ATV, if the requirements to the effluent quality in terms of nitrites are specified. The authors, on the basis of the calculations, make conclusions about the risk of failure to achieve the effluent quality in terms of ammonia nitrogen as well as 1 mg/l while using ATV, because ATV is a stochastic model, that is, all dependencies presented in this method have been determined for the specific operating conditions. Moreover, as specified in the ATV description, this method, even in limited conditions, is applicable strictly for urban wastewater. The calculations show that if there are requirements for the effluent quality in terms of nitrites, regardless of the required concentration value of nitrites, the ATV method is absolutely not suitable, while ASM2d, taking into account the fact that it is based on the formulas of enzymatic kinetics, provides for calculating aeration tanks for any required effluent quality in terms of both ammonium nitrogen and nitrite nitrogen and is applicable for any type of wastewater.

Key words

biological treatment , nitrification , activated sludge , kinetic constants , industrial and municipal wastewater , comparative calculation of the biological treatment facilities , ATV and ASM2d process calculation methods , aerobic age of activated sludge , theoretical and stochastic models

The further text is accessible on a paid subscription.
For authorisation enter the login/password.
Or subscribe

REFERENCES

1. Khar’kina O. V. [Terms of reference for the reconstruction of treatment facilities: how to avoid mistakes]. Nailuchshchie Dostupnye Tekhnologii Vodosnabzheniia i Vodootvedeniia, 2021, no. 2, pp. 54–59. (In Russian).
2. Shvetsov V. N., Stepanov S. V., Khar’kina O. V. [Comparison of the calculation results for aeration tanks using the NII VODGEO/SamGTU and ASM2d models]. Vodosnabzhenie i Sanitarnaia Tekhnika, 2021, no. 5, pp. 18–29. (In Russian).
3. Standard ATV-DVWK-A 131 «Dimensioning of Single-Stage Activated Sludge Plants», May 2000.
4. Henze M., Gujer W., Mino T., Matsuo T., Wentzel M. C., van R. Marais G., van Loosdrecht M. C. M. Activated sludge Model No. 2d, ASM2D. Water Science Technology, 1999, no. 39 (1), pp. 165–182.
5. Khar’kina O. V., Baumgarten S., Zolotykh S. V., Zakiev R. R. [Strict requirements are achievable]. Ekologiia Proizvodstva, 2019, no. 9, pp. 96–101. (In Russian).
6. Khar’kina O. V. [Methods for calculating biological treatment facilities with the removal of nitrogen and phosphorus]. Vodoochistka. Vodopodgotovka. Vodosnabzhenie, 2019, no. 9, pp. 30–42. (In Russian).
7. Kharkina O. V. Effektivnaia ekspluatatsiia sooruzhenii biologicheskoi ochistki. [Effective operation of biological treatment facilities. Volgograd, Panorama Publ., 2015, 433 p.].
8. Wentzel M. C., Ekama G. A., Marais GvR. Processes and modelling of nitrification denitrification biological excess phosphorus removal systems. Water Science and Technology, 1992, v. 25, no. 6, pp. 59–82.
9. Gujer W. Design of a nitrifying activated sludge process with the aid of dynamic simulation. Prog. Water Technology, 1977, no. 9 (2), pp. 323–336.
10. Moizhes O. V. [OxiD dynamic model of biological treatment facilities]. Vodosnabzhenie i Sanitarnaia Tekhnika, 2008, no. 10, pp. 52–57. (In Russian).